DPRK becomes MPRK
The Democrats wish to create a new state for Mexico, "Alta California", a model to infect the nation?
I have occasionally referred to my home state, consistent with its international economic importance and domestic reputation, as the Democrat Republic of Kalifornia. This is a not so superficial reference to North Korea, the last bastion of socialist totalitarianism. That’s right, Russia, China, Vietnam, and Cuba all practice a form of state-controlled capitalistic “socialism”, and although all subject to an entrenched political elite are no longer on a par with the original DPRK. But we on the Left Coast are moving closer to our sister state across the Pacific. Small steps, tiny incrementalism, consistent with a western drift from the San Andreas Fault. Politically, if not geographically, discernable.
Our governor, Gavin Newsom, is solid member of our state’s political elite inclusive of the Getty family, the Pelosi’s, the Jerry Brown residual cadre, and of course the remaining influence of Willie Brown who gave us Kamala Harris. Newsom often speaks of California as if it were already seceded from the U.S., with its international economic strength and completely separate energy and environmental policies (remember all our fossil fuel comes mostly from foreign sources as no pipelines bridge the Sierras and fossil fuel extraction is gradually being outlawed). Part and parcel of that separation is our unique heritage, being the temporarily stolen property of local indigenous peoples and especially those of Mexico who escaped Spanish oppression. He seems to conveniently forget that Russia once held sway over a large part of the northern half of the state. Given our “special” status, with a population much more dependent on government largesse than the rest of the U.S., a sizeable group of “out of sight” rich from the software/hardware and film industry (many of whom seem to be leaving for pastures where they can keep more of their own green), climate in the south that sustains year-round homelessness, and an agricultural industry largely supported by indentured servitude of “undocumented immigrants” (undocumented voters), Newsom’s constant assertion that our nation-state’s powers and “rights” are somehow above those of other states and even the inconveniently interfering federal government is not unexpected.
Nowhere is his contempt for the interference of Federal interests more evident than in this state’s critical industry of illegal labor importation. The Democrat party was the promoter and sustainer of slavery, whose subjects were likewise undocumented. That party may have lost the first Civil War, but found a way to sustain their institution of servile cheap labor through Jim Crow after Reconstruction was ended by the corrupt deal behind Rutherford B. Hayes’ Presidential election of 1876. Newsom and his supermajority Democrat party in California is committed to maintaining our domestic version of China’s economic miracle based in endless cheap labor whose welfare, and occasional criminality, can be ignored or even protected by the state. Some of that minimal criminality, such as the marijuana black market and drug cartel investments, is after all good for the 4th largest economy in the world. Soto voce, as a pretender to the Presidential throne, he will protect, enhance, and sustain exporting the California model to the rest of the nation, already well underway. His new underclass will each count for much more than three-fifths of a citizen, getting full economic support and transitioning rapidly through amnesty to the newest version of Lyndon Johnson’s “Democrats for life”. That forceful support and desire to export this renewed societal model is nowhere clearer than his and local governmental leaders’ efforts to nullify federal immigration law. These efforts are funded by generosity from our national glitterati who want to assure a steady supply of people “to wipe our asses”, and your tax dollars from anachronistic Democrats seeking a to return to “Jaime Cuervo”.
A recently deleted post on X may contain information on the finances of the LA Riots and the planned demonstrations/protests/?riots? for June 14. The source of this information is not clear thus it is highly suspect until a respected media source (the New York Times?) investigates and confirms it.
“On June 8, 2025, Christy Walton (heir to the Walmart fortune) paid for a full-page ad in The New York Times, explicitly calling for mobilization on June 14 under the “No Kings” banner, a movement tied to nationwide anti-Trump protests. Her signature is reported to be on a $2.3 million check to the Times, drawn from her personal account at C&W Enterprises in Jackson, Wyoming, processed on June 7, 2025. So there are definitely some direct actions by her. Walton funnels cash through the Open Society Foundations (OSF), chaired by Alex Soros, with a $10 million grant approved on May 28, 2025, earmarked for “grassroots mobilization.” An analysis of OSF’s Belize server logs shows $3.2 million rerouted to local LA riot organizers, including CHIRLA (Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights), active during the June 7 ICE raid clashes.
It was said that Walton uses Walmart’s logistics network to move untraceable cash $750,000 in small bills via Tijuana warehouses to riot leaders, a tactic mirroring her alleged 2019 opioid trafficking routes. Walmart’s HR records show a 15% uptick in undocumented worker hires since May 2025, with payroll deductions ($450,000) redirected to protest supplies, linking her labor exploitation to riot funding.
Her son, Lukas Walton, authorized a $4 million transfer from Builders Vision on June 6, 2025, to a shell NGO, “Freedom Alliance,” which booked rally permits in LA (e.g., Pershing Square, 532 S Olive St, 34.0500°N, 118.2517°W). Remote data confirms his email directive: “Ensure June 14 momentum. Her sister-in-law, Alice Walton, contributed $2.5 million via her Art Bridges foundation on June 4, 2025, to cover protester transportation, with bus rentals tracked to Greyhound depots in Arkansas and Texas.”
What is not suspect is the large amount of funds that CHIRLA has received from the State of California. We are effectively paying for our own riots.
Jennifer Van Laar at Redstate.com published a recent article detailing our federal and state government’s funding of at least one NGO, CHIRLA, that has been initiating and sustaining our local riots (pardon, misspoke, “mostly peaceful demonstrations”). She notes the original protests over a federal joint task force (not just ICE) serving search and arrest warrants (issued by a federal judge with the high standards of probable cause, higher than those used to issue surveillance against U.S. citizens by the FISA court in the Russia hoax), began to escalate with the arrest of a union leader for sitting in front of federal vehicles and obstructing their progress, and especially at the urging of a community leader.
“Angelica Salas, Executive Director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) held a press conference calling for broad demonstrations against ICE, and tensions and violence escalated. Hundreds of "protesters" turned into thousands of rioters before long, complete with matching t-shirts and professionally printed signs, signaling the involvement of organizations with some degree of funding behind them.”
Substacker @DataRepublican “…found, CHIRLA and the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSLWEB) are two of the NGOs implicated in this ongoing riot.”
Van Laar goes on to detail findings of attorney Lauren Powell: “Yes, there's government money going into the org; that's not startling. What is startling is the amount. According to a financial audit submitted to the State of California, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, CHIRLA took in $34 million from various government contracts, and 96 percent of the government funding was from the State of California. That amount is nearly three times the prior year's government contract total. CHIRLA's total revenue for the year ending June 30, 2023, was $45 million, meaning that 75.5 percent of its revenue came from government contracts.”
“Agencies contributing to CHIRLA’s funding during this period included the California Department of Social Services, the California Arts Council, the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, and the Department of Homeland Security.”
LA Mayor Bass (of the Castro Venceremos Brigade in her youth) got that contract for CHIRLA through her contact and friend, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas!
Powell and Van Laar noted that one focus of CHIRLA was the LA Raids Rapid Response Network which engages in direct action to “shut down detention centers” (federal law enforcement facilities). Overall, CHIRLA’s use of California and federal taxes “ are going to train high school and college students in how to break immigration law and become Marxist agitators, to ensure illegal aliens are counted in the U.S. Census, to organize illegal aliens already in the country, and to fund their legal representation against deportation.”
Her final conclusion seems inescapable: “Your tax dollars fund an organization that organizes efforts to directly interfere with the federal government’s lawful exercise of authority. Then, through its lobbying arm, that organization helps get Democrats elected to office, who then repay the favor by ensuring increased funding."
Walton and her fellow Crowbirds are national in scope. The CHIRLA model is easily exportable. Any second Civil War (fought on the streets and legislative halls) will of course not be Newsom’s fault. He’ll be great in ‘28.